Thinking and Thought - Lord Byron Mad Bad And Dangerous

The distinction between “thinking” and “thought” can be subtle yet profound, and this difference might indeed offer an interesting twist to René Descartes’ famous philosophical assertion, “I think, therefore I am.” In this exploration, we delve into how this distinction could reshape our understanding of Descartes’ philosophy.

The Essence of “Thinking”

Thinking” is an active process. It involves the engagement of the mind in the deliberate act of considering, analyzing, or pondering over something. When Descartes says, “I think, therefore I am,” he emphasizes the act of thinking as evidence of existence. The mere act of questioning or doubting one’s existence is, in itself, a form of thinking. Therefore, the existence of the thinking process is undeniable proof of the existence of the entity that thinks.

The Nature of “Thought”

On the other hand, “thought” can be seen as the product or outcome of the thinking process. It is more static compared to the dynamic nature of thinking. Thoughts are the ideas, beliefs, or notions that are formed as a result of thinking. They are like snapshots of the mind’s activity at a given moment.

Descartes’ Proposition: A Revision

If Descartes had said, “I think, therefore there is thought,” the focus would shift from the existence of the self to the existence of the thought itself. This proposition could suggest that the act of thinking validates the presence of thoughts, not necessarily the thinker. It acknowledges that thoughts exist because they are being thought, but it doesn’t directly affirm the existence of the thinker beyond the thinking process.

Implications of the Revised Statement

This revised statement opens up a different philosophical inquiry. While Descartes’ original statement centers on self-awareness and self-confirmation, the focus on thought itself leads to questions about the nature, origin, and independence of thoughts. It raises the question: Can thoughts exist independently of a thinker? This perspective could align with certain interpretations in Eastern philosophy where thoughts are seen as transient and not necessarily the core of a person’s identity.


In conclusion, while Descartes’ original proposition offers a foundational perspective in Western philosophy about the certainty of one’s existence through the act of thinking, the alternative statement, “I think, therefore there is thought,” shifts the focus to the nature and existence of thoughts themselves. This subtle but vital difference opens up new realms of philosophical exploration, challenging our understanding of the relationship between the thinker and their thoughts, and possibly leading to a more detached view of the mind’s workings. And the question what is a thinker and what is a thought.

Lord Byron